Ad is loading...
FSMUX vs PEXTX
FSMUX vs PEXTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs PEXTX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
Putnam Tax Exempt Income R6
Price$7.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets555.26M
FSMUX vs PEXTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. PEXTX (555M). FSMUX pays higher dividends than PEXTX: FSMUX (3.83) vs PEXTX (3.63). FSMUX was incepted earlier than PEXTX: FSMUX (4 years) vs PEXTX (7 years). PEXTX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. PEXTX (35.00). FSMUX (0) and PEXTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. PEXTX (-1.81).
| FSMUX | PEXTX | FSMUX / PEXTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.64 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.64 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.898 | -2.945 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 555M | 2,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.83 | 3.63 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | -1.81 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.98 | -2.66 | -262% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -6.87 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...