Ad is loading...
FSMUX vs PMLCX
FSMUX vs PMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs PMLCX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.66B
PIMCO Municipal Bond C
Price$9.19
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.81B
FSMUX vs PMLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. PMLCX (3.81B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than PMLCX: FSMUX (3.76) vs PMLCX (3.18). FSMUX was incepted earlier than PMLCX: FSMUX (4 years) vs PMLCX (27 years). PMLCX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). PMLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FSMUX (48.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMLCX: FSMUX (0) vs PMLCX (1000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.84 vs. PMLCX (1.31).
| FSMUX | PMLCX | FSMUX / PMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 1.25 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.25 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.012 | -1.529 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 3.81B | 307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 3.18 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.84 | 1.31 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.86 | 4.51 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 3.66 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...