Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMUX vs RETCX
FSMUX vs RETCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs RETCX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.99B
Victory Tax-Exempt C
Price$8.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.88M
FSMUX vs RETCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. RETCX (32.9M). FSMUX pays higher dividends than RETCX: FSMUX (3.94) vs RETCX (3.20). FSMUX was incepted earlier than RETCX: FSMUX (4 years) vs RETCX (25 years). RETCX (3.23) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RETCX (18.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RETCX: FSMUX (0) vs RETCX (2500). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.43 vs. RETCX (-2.31).
| FSMUX | RETCX | FSMUX / RETCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 1.60 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 3.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.346 | -3.624 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 32.9M | 36,474% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.94 | 3.20 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.43 | -2.31 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.19 | 2.11 | 388% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -4.83 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement