Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNKX vs MMFGX
FSNKX vs MMFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNKX vs. MMFGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNKX is a Hold and MMFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.11B vs. MMFGX (4.59M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than MMFGX: FSNKX (3.02) vs MMFGX (1.85). FSNKX was incepted earlier than MMFGX: FSNKX (8 years) vs MMFGX (7 years). MMFGX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSNKX (0.43). MMFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSNKX (13.00). FSNKX (0) and MMFGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MMFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. FSNKX (5.78). FSNKX return over 5 years is better than : 6.71 vs. MMFGX (2.08).
| FSNKX | MMFGX | FSNKX / MMFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.99 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.18 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.610 | 3.380 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 4.59M | 67,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 1.85 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 6.57 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.95 | 11.99 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.71 | 2.08 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement