Ad is loading...
FSNPX vs RBEDX
FSNPX vs RBEDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNPX vs. RBEDX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNPX is a Hold and RBEDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEDX has more cash in the bank: 33.6B vs. FSNPX (21.4B). FSNPX pays higher dividends than RBEDX: FSNPX (2.12) vs RBEDX (1.89). FSNPX was incepted earlier than RBEDX: FSNPX (7 years) vs RBEDX (10 years). FSNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBEDX (5.00). FSNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEDX: FSNPX (0) vs RBEDX (250). FSNPX (8.41) and RBEDX (8.11) have marching annual gain over last year. RBEDX return over 5 years is better than : 13.07 vs. FSNPX (4.07).
| FSNPX | RBEDX | FSNPX / RBEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.712 | 8.246 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4B | 33.6B | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 1.89 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.41 | 8.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.71 | -2.58 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.07 | 13.07 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers