Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNPX vs RBEDX
FSNPX vs RBEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNPX vs. RBEDX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNPX is a Hold and RBEDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEDX has more cash in the bank: 32.6B vs. FSNPX (19.9B). FSNPX pays higher dividends than RBEDX: FSNPX (2.30) vs RBEDX (1.95). FSNPX was incepted earlier than RBEDX: FSNPX (8 years) vs RBEDX (11 years). RBEDX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSNPX (0.52). FSNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RBEDX (10.00). FSNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEDX: FSNPX (0) vs RBEDX (250). RBEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. FSNPX (5.55). RBEDX return over 5 years is better than : 18.77 vs. FSNPX (13.89).
| FSNPX | RBEDX | FSNPX / RBEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.11 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.11 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.172 | 7.765 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9B | 32.6B | 61% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 1.95 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 6.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.17 | 23.27 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.89 | 18.77 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement