Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNQX vs PDFGX
FSNQX vs PDFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNQX vs. PDFGX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNQX is a Hold and PDFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNQX has more cash in the bank: 32.2B vs. PDFGX (57.1M). PDFGX pays higher dividends than FSNQX: PDFGX (3.50) vs FSNQX (2.06). FSNQX was incepted earlier than PDFGX: FSNQX (8 years) vs PDFGX (9 years). PDFGX (10.17) is less costly to investors than FSNQX (0.56). PDFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSNQX (16.00). FSNQX (0) and PDFGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. PDFGX (-0.58). PDFGX (17.54) and FSNQX (16.90) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSNQX | PDFGX | FSNQX / PDFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 10.17 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.500 | 7.493 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.2B | 57.1M | 56,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 3.50 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | -0.58 | -1,297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.84 | 8.08 | 370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.90 | 17.54 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement