Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNVX vs RBKTX
FSNVX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNVX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNVX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 47.1B vs. FSNVX (29B). FSNVX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FSNVX (1.49) vs RBKTX (0.55). FSNVX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FSNVX (8 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSNVX (0.63). FSNVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FSNVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FSNVX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. FSNVX (8.48). RBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.69 vs. FSNVX (38.04).
| FSNVX | RBKTX | FSNVX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.45 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.45 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.796 | 6.300 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 47.1B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.55 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 8.94 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.53 | 34.53 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.04 | 40.69 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement