Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNVX vs RBKTX
FSNVX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNVX vs. RBKTX commentary
Aug 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNVX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. FSNVX (30.5B). FSNVX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FSNVX (1.42) vs RBKTX (0.53). FSNVX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FSNVX (8 years) vs RBKTX (19 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSNVX (0.63). FSNVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FSNVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FSNVX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX (12.28) and FSNVX (11.76) have marching annual gain over last year. RBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.80 vs. FSNVX (32.68).
| FSNVX | RBKTX | FSNVX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.45 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.45 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.938 | 12.601 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.5B | 49B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.53 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 12.28 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.90 | 33.99 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.68 | 36.80 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers