Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNVX vs RCKTX
FSNVX vs RCKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNVX vs. RCKTX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNVX is a Hold and RCKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCKTX has more cash in the bank: 47.9B vs. FSNVX (30.3B). FSNVX pays higher dividends than RCKTX: FSNVX (1.43) vs RCKTX (0.89). FSNVX was incepted earlier than RCKTX: FSNVX (8 years) vs RCKTX (18 years). RCKTX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSNVX (0.63). FSNVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RCKTX (6.00). FSNVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKTX: FSNVX (0) vs RCKTX (250). RCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. FSNVX (6.43). RCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.12 vs. FSNVX (32.96).
| FSNVX | RCKTX | FSNVX / RCKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.785 | 10.367 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.3B | 47.9B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.89 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 9.74 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.05 | 38.98 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 40.12 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers