Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNVX vs RCKTX
FSNVX vs RCKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNVX vs. RCKTX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNVX is a Hold and RCKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCKTX has more cash in the bank: 47.1B vs. FSNVX (29B). FSNVX pays higher dividends than RCKTX: FSNVX (1.49) vs RCKTX (0.93). FSNVX was incepted earlier than RCKTX: FSNVX (8 years) vs RCKTX (18 years). RCKTX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSNVX (0.63). FSNVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RCKTX (6.00). FSNVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKTX: FSNVX (0) vs RCKTX (250). RCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. FSNVX (8.48). RCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.19 vs. FSNVX (38.04).
| FSNVX | RCKTX | FSNVX / RCKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.796 | 6.498 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 47.1B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.93 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 9.42 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.53 | 35.94 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.04 | 43.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement