Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNVX vs RHGTX
FSNVX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNVX vs. RHGTX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNVX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 48.3B vs. FSNVX (30.5B). FSNVX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FSNVX (1.42) vs RHGTX (1.32). FSNVX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FSNVX (8 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). FSNVX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RHGTX (0.50). FSNVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). FSNVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: FSNVX (0) vs RHGTX (250). RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.39 vs. FSNVX (10.12). RHGTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.70 vs. FSNVX (30.74).
| FSNVX | RHGTX | FSNVX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.294 | 13.323 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.5B | 48.3B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.32 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 13.39 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.80 | 36.93 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 41.70 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers