Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LOGSX
FSPHX vs LOGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LOGSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LOGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LOGSX (48.3M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LOGSX: FSPHX (0.02) vs LOGSX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LOGSX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LOGSX (24 years). LOGSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. LOGSX (11.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LOGSX: FSPHX (0) vs LOGSX (2000). LOGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.83 vs. FSPHX (-11.66). LOGSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.84 vs. FSPHX (2.10).
| FSPHX | LOGSX | FSPHX / LOGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.02 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.02 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.413 | 0.797 | -428% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 48.3M | 13,282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.66 | -2.83 | 412% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.23 | -5.14 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.10 | 15.84 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.27 | -1.47 | -698% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...