Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs SBHIX
FSPHX vs SBHIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SBHIX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and SBHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. SBHIX (10.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SBHIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs SBHIX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SBHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SBHIX (22 years). SBHIX (2.32) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. SBHIX (17.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHIX: FSPHX (0) vs SBHIX (250). SBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.53 vs. FSPHX (-8.74). SBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.81 vs. FSPHX (-5.56).
| FSPHX | SBHIX | FSPHX / SBHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.32 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.32 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.211 | 1.593 | -327% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 10.4M | 59,635% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.74 | 0.53 | -1,664% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.02 | -2.05 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.56 | 5.81 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.38 | -30.26 | -41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers