Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SHPCX
FSPHX vs SHPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHPCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SHPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. SHPCX (10.1M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SHPCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs SHPCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHPCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHPCX (26 years). SHPCX (3.32) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. SHPCX (17.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHPCX: FSPHX (0) vs SHPCX (250). SHPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.86 vs. FSPHX (-13.58). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -16.93 vs. SHPCX (-18.18).
| FSPHX | SHPCX | FSPHX / SHPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.32 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.32 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.064 | 2.613 | -194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 10.1M | 58,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.58 | -8.86 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.81 | -10.74 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.93 | -18.18 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.00 | -56.25 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers