Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPTX vs RCGTX
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPTX vs RCGTX
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$38.47
Change+$0.22 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.61B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$14.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPTX is a Buy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. RCGTX (1.58B). FSPTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: FSPTX (44 years) vs RCGTX (23 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCGTX (23.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: FSPTX (0) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.58 vs. FSPTX (7.63). FSPTX return over 5 years is better than : 64.40 vs. RCGTX (-66.70).
| FSPTX | RCGTX | FSPTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.715 | 8.394 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.6B | 1.58B | 988% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.63 | 17.58 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 106.79 | -3.26 | -3,278% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.40 | -66.70 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 216.57 | -70.44 | -307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement