Ad is loading...
FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYCNX
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$89.41
Change+$1.61 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.84M
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. RYCNX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Buy and RYCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 467M vs. RYCNX (5.82M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYCNX: FSRFX (1.42) vs RYCNX (0.73). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FSRFX (39 years) vs RYCNX (24 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.70). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. FSRFX (33.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FSRFX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). RYCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.14 vs. FSRFX (-14.58). FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.08 vs. RYCNX (10.25).
| FSRFX | RYCNX | FSRFX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.698 | -18.513 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 467M | 5.82M | 8,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.73 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.58 | -11.14 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.42 | -30.83 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.08 | 10.25 | 459% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.71 | -20.10 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...