Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYCNX
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$98.06
Change-$0.21 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465.99M
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. RYCNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Buy and RYCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 466M vs. RYCNX (6.15M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYCNX: FSRFX (1.36) vs RYCNX (0.68). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FSRFX (39 years) vs RYCNX (24 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FSRFX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). RYCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. FSRFX (-5.98). FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.21 vs. RYCNX (-1.24).
| FSRFX | RYCNX | FSRFX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.146 | -6.193 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 466M | 6.15M | 7,583% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.68 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.98 | 2.41 | -248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.00 | -14.80 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.21 | -1.24 | -2,914% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.73 | -3.71 | -612% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement