Ad is loading...
FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYCNX
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$94.89
Change+$1.76 (+1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.83M
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. RYCNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Buy and RYCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 438M vs. RYCNX (6.11M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYCNX: FSRFX (1.46) vs RYCNX (0.74). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FSRFX (39 years) vs RYCNX (24 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FSRFX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). RYCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.26 vs. FSRFX (-12.82). FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.97 vs. RYCNX (11.67).
| FSRFX | RYCNX | FSRFX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.107 | -13.133 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 438M | 6.11M | 7,171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.74 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.82 | -7.26 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.69 | -18.55 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.97 | 11.67 | 428% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.43 | -14.43 | -72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers