Ad is loading...
FSSKX vs GFAFX
FSSKX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSKX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
FSSKX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSKX vs. GFAFX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSKX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. FSSKX (6.46B). FSSKX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FSSKX (0.92) vs GFAFX (0.35). FSSKX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FSSKX (17 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSSKX (0.36). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSSKX (3.00). FSSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FSSKX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. FSSKX (1.17). FSSKX return over 5 years is better than : 73.01 vs. GFAFX (44.32).
| FSSKX | GFAFX | FSSKX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.67 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.67 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.771 | -2.440 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 286B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.35 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | 3.57 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.26 | 34.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.01 | 44.32 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.17 | 61.32 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...