Ad is loading...
FSSKX vs RGABX
FSSKX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FSSKX vs RGABX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
FSSKX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSKX vs. RGABX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSKX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. FSSKX (6.46B). FSSKX pays higher dividends than RGABX: FSSKX (0.92) vs RGABX (0.00). FSSKX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FSSKX (17 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSSKX (0.36). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSSKX (3.00). FSSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FSSKX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.45 vs. FSSKX (1.17). FSSKX return over 5 years is better than : 73.01 vs. RGABX (35.95).
| FSSKX | RGABX | FSSKX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.39 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.39 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.771 | -2.815 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 286B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | 1.45 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.26 | 28.15 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.01 | 35.95 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.17 | 48.42 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...