Ad is loading...
FSSKX vs RGEBX
FSSKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSSKX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$69.50
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
FSSKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSKX vs. RGEBX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSKX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. FSSKX (6.46B). FSSKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FSSKX (0.92) vs RGEBX (0.00). FSSKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FSSKX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSSKX (0.36). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSSKX (3.00). FSSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FSSKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.37 vs. FSSKX (1.17). FSSKX return over 5 years is better than : 73.01 vs. RGEBX (40.57).
| FSSKX | RGEBX | FSSKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.09 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.09 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.771 | -2.716 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 286B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | 2.37 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.26 | 30.92 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.01 | 40.57 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.17 | 54.82 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...