Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LMBMX
FSSNX vs LMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LMBMX
FSSNX vs LMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LMBMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. LMBMX (140M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LMBMX: FSSNX (0.92) vs LMBMX (0.36). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LMBMX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LMBMX (14 years). LMBMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBMX: FSSNX (0) vs LMBMX (1000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.33 vs. LMBMX (33.90). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 34.42 vs. LMBMX (6.46).
| FSSNX | LMBMX | FSSNX / LMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.720 | 14.867 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 140M | 24,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.36 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.33 | 33.90 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.43 | 57.10 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.42 | 6.46 | 533% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.35 | 49.82 | 308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement