Ad is loading...
FSTJ
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
JMTM
Price
$4.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

FSTJ vs JMTM

Header iconFSTJ vs JMTM Comparison
Open Charts FSTJ vs JMTMBanner chart's image
First America Resources
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.5K
CapitalizationN/A
James Maritime Holdings
Price$4.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
FSTJ vs JMTM Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSTJ vs. JMTM commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTJ is a Hold and JMTM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FSTJ: $0.17 vs. JMTM: $4.25)
Brand notoriety: FSTJ and JMTM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSTJ: 100% vs. JMTM: 84%
Market capitalization -- FSTJ: $2.88M vs. JMTM: $41.58K
FSTJ [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.88M. JMTM’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $41.58K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSTJ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJMTM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSTJ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JMTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JMTM is a better buy in the long-term than FSTJ.

Price Growth

FSTJ (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JMTM (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +6.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTJ($2.88M) has a higher market cap than JMTM($41.6K). FSTJ YTD gains are higher at: -16.706 vs. JMTM (-29.167).
FSTJJMTMFSTJ / JMTM
Capitalization2.88M41.6K6,928%
EBITDA-18.4KN/A-
Gain YTD-16.706-29.16757%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash102KN/A-
Total Debt229KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSTJ vs JMTM: Fundamental Ratings
FSTJ
JMTM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9636
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSTJ's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JMTM (69). This means that FSTJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than JMTM’s over the last 12 months.

JMTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSTJ (96). This means that JMTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSTJ’s over the last 12 months.

JMTM's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FSTJ (100). This means that JMTM’s stock grew similarly to FSTJ’s over the last 12 months.

JMTM's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as FSTJ (71). This means that JMTM’s stock grew similarly to FSTJ’s over the last 12 months.

JMTM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FSTJ (100). This means that JMTM’s stock grew similarly to FSTJ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNSTX14.070.05
+0.36%
Fidelity Infrastructure
VCGEX6.39-0.02
-0.31%
VALIC Company I Emerg Economies
BGITX13.38-0.12
-0.92%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 2
FLCPX24.29-0.33
-1.34%
Fidelity SAI US Large Cap Index
GMRIX13.12-0.18
-1.35%
Nationwide Small Cap Index R6

FSTJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTJ has been loosely correlated with PBAJ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSTJ jumps, then PBAJ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSTJ
1D Price
Change %
FSTJ100%
N/A
PBAJ - FSTJ
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NETDU - FSTJ
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMBU - FSTJ
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
FGCO - FSTJ
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETER - FSTJ
8%
Poorly correlated
+89.29%
More

JMTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JMTM and CSTUF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JMTM and CSTUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMTM
1D Price
Change %
JMTM100%
N/A
CSTUF - JMTM
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTJ - JMTM
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETER - JMTM
1%
Poorly correlated
+89.29%
FCIC - JMTM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILXP - JMTM
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More