Ad is loading...
FSTUX vs RMEBX
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income Investor
Price$26.35
Change-$0.43 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.66B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.07
Change-$0.84 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.15B
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. FSTUX (3.66B). FSTUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSTUX (1.51) vs RMEBX (1.15). FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTUX (39 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSTUX (0.94). FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. FSTUX (5.08). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.38 vs. FSTUX (32.52).
| FSTUX | RMEBX | FSTUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.700 | 3.661 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 104B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.15 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.08 | 8.24 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.60 | 18.60 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.52 | 52.38 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.53 | 67.56 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...