Ad is loading...
FSTUX vs RMEBX
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income Investor
Price$25.30
Change+$1.44 (+6.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.23B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. FSTUX (3.23B). FSTUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSTUX (1.53) vs RMEBX (1.18). FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTUX (39 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSTUX (0.94). FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. FSTUX (-7.86). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. FSTUX (27.02).
| FSTUX | RMEBX | FSTUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.489 | -7.747 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 98.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.18 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.86 | -4.56 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.01 | -1.07 | 652% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.02 | 44.36 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.07 | 44.99 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...