Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTUX vs RMEBX
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income Investor
Price$26.65
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.55B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. FSTUX (3.56B). FSTUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSTUX (1.39) vs RMEBX (1.16). FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTUX (39 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSTUX (0.94). FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. FSTUX (3.87). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. FSTUX (32.10).
| FSTUX | RMEBX | FSTUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.657 | 5.349 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 105B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.16 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.87 | 8.30 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 17.96 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.10 | 49.85 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.54 | 68.21 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers