Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSVOX vs RDBTX
FSVOX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. FSVOX (1.4M). RDBTX pays higher dividends than FSVOX: RDBTX (2.65) vs FSVOX (2.39). FSVOX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: FSVOX (2 years) vs RDBTX (18 years). FSVOX (0.67) and RDBTX (0.64) have similar cost to investors . FSVOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. RDBTX (6.00). FSVOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDBTX: FSVOX (0) vs RDBTX (250). RDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. FSVOX (4.89).
| FSVOX | RDBTX | FSVOX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.64 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.64 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.682 | 7.283 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4M | 4.78B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 2.65 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 6.65 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 20.92 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 19.61 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement