Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSVOX vs RDBTX
FSVOX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.8B vs. FSVOX (1.39M). RDBTX pays higher dividends than FSVOX: RDBTX (2.65) vs FSVOX (2.39). FSVOX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: FSVOX (2 years) vs RDBTX (19 years). FSVOX (0.67) and RDBTX (0.64) have similar cost to investors . FSVOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. RDBTX (6.00). FSVOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDBTX: FSVOX (0) vs RDBTX (250). RDBTX (7.27) and FSVOX (7.07) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FSVOX | RDBTX | FSVOX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.64 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.64 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.680 | 8.756 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39M | 4.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 2.65 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.07 | 7.27 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 17.03 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 19.27 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement