Ad is loading...
FSVOX vs TRRGX
FSVOX vs TRRGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRRGX has more cash in the bank: 5.03B vs. FSVOX (1.33M). TRRGX pays higher dividends than FSVOX: TRRGX (2.72) vs FSVOX (2.56). FSVOX was incepted earlier than TRRGX: FSVOX (2 years) vs TRRGX (21 years). FSVOX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TRRGX (0.50). FSVOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TRRGX (27.80). FSVOX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRRGX: FSVOX (0) vs TRRGX (2500). FSVOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.20 vs. TRRGX (4.85).
| FSVOX | TRRGX | FSVOX / TRRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.50 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.50 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.380 | -0.477 | -80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33M | 5.03B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 2.72 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 4.85 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 4.44 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FSAAX | 15.09 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A | |||
| VMFGX | 398.98 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Idx I | |||
| FCIVX | 15.95 | N/A | N/A |
| Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service | |||
| CISAX | 7.82 | N/A | N/A |
| Copeland International Small Cap A | |||
| NSRSX | 42.76 | N/A | N/A |
| Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6 | |||