Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWSX vs RBEDX
FSWSX vs RBEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEDX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. FSWSX (2.67M). RBEDX pays higher dividends than FSWSX: RBEDX (2.01) vs FSWSX (1.63). FSWSX was incepted earlier than RBEDX: FSWSX (2 years) vs RBEDX (11 years). RBEDX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSWSX (0.94). FSWSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RBEDX (10.00). FSWSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEDX: FSWSX (0) vs RBEDX (250). FSWSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. RBEDX (6.16).
| FSWSX | RBEDX | FSWSX / RBEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.11 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.11 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.071 | 5.469 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67M | 32.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 2.01 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 6.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 22.54 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 19.34 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers