Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWSX vs RBEDX
FSWSX vs RBEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEDX has more cash in the bank: 32.8B vs. FSWSX (2.72M). RBEDX pays higher dividends than FSWSX: RBEDX (1.95) vs FSWSX (1.58). FSWSX was incepted earlier than RBEDX: FSWSX (2 years) vs RBEDX (11 years). RBEDX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSWSX (0.94). FSWSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RBEDX (10.00). FSWSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEDX: FSWSX (0) vs RBEDX (250). RBEDX (7.81) and FSWSX (7.76) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FSWSX | RBEDX | FSWSX / RBEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.11 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.11 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.697 | 8.103 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72M | 32.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.95 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 7.81 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 23.47 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.15 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement