Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWSX vs RHDTX
FSWSX vs RHDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. FSWSX (2.67M). RHDTX pays higher dividends than FSWSX: RHDTX (2.61) vs FSWSX (1.63). FSWSX was incepted earlier than RHDTX: FSWSX (2 years) vs RHDTX (10 years). FSWSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RHDTX (0.45). FSWSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RHDTX (10.00). FSWSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHDTX: FSWSX (0) vs RHDTX (250). RHDTX (6.81) and FSWSX (6.56) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FSWSX | RHDTX | FSWSX / RHDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.45 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.45 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.071 | 5.714 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67M | 32.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 2.61 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 6.81 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 24.56 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 22.63 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers