Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYDX vs RBKTX
FSYDX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 47.8B vs. FSYDX (10.3M). FSYDX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FSYDX (1.37) vs RBKTX (0.55). FSYDX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FSYDX (2 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSYDX (0.38). FSYDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FSYDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FSYDX (0) vs RBKTX (250). FSYDX (12.17) and RBKTX (11.65) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FSYDX | RBKTX | FSYDX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 1.45 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 1.45 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.039 | 9.224 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3M | 47.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.55 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.17 | 11.65 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 35.75 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 44.28 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement