Ad is loading...
FTBFX vs PDBRX
FTBFX vs PDBRX Comparison
Open Charts FTBFX vs PDBRX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
Price$9.42
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.85B
PGIM Total Return Bond R2
Price$11.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.44B
FTBFX vs PDBRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTBFX vs. PDBRX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTBFX is a Hold and PDBRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBRX has more cash in the bank: 48.4B vs. FTBFX (38.9B). FTBFX (4.44) and PDBRX (4.25) have matching dividends . FTBFX was incepted earlier than PDBRX: FTBFX (23 years) vs PDBRX (7 years). PDBRX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FTBFX (0.44). FTBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. PDBRX (113.00). FTBFX (0) and PDBRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTBFX (6.05) and PDBRX (5.80) have marching annual gain over last year. FTBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.77 vs. PDBRX (-1.30).
| FTBFX | PDBRX | FTBFX / PDBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.89 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.97 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.957 | 0.869 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.9B | 48.4B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.44 | 4.25 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 5.80 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.10 | 3.54 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.77 | -1.30 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...