Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDHX vs MBXIX
FTDHX vs MBXIX Comparison
Open Charts FTDHX vs MBXIX
American Funds College 2039 529-F-3
Price$12.64
Change+$0.05 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy I
Price$39.02
Change+$0.12 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.18B
FTDHX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.18B vs. FTDHX (1.61B). MBXIX pays higher dividends than FTDHX: MBXIX (1.92) vs FTDHX (1.47). FTDHX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: FTDHX (4 years) vs MBXIX (10 years). MBXIX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FTDHX (0.44). MBXIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDHX: MBXIX (2500) vs FTDHX (1000000). FTDHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. MBXIX (-1.20).
| FTDHX | MBXIX | FTDHX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.03 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.03 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.574 | 0.206 | 4,645% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 8.18B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.92 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.43 | -1.20 | -1,123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.09 | 11.07 | 471% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 57.90 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers