It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTRP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTDR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FTDR (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while NTRP (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -8.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.85%.
FTDR is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
FTDR | NTRP | FTDR / NTRP | |
Capitalization | 2.55B | 4.22M | 60,478% |
EBITDA | 306M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 63.089 | -47.193 | -134% |
P/E Ratio | 15.11 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.78B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 325M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 610M | N/A | - |
FTDR | NTRP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTRP's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTDR (94) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that NTRP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTDR’s over the last 12 months.
FTDR's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as NTRP (100) in the null industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
FTDR's SMR Rating (12) in the Homebuilding industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTRP (98) in the null industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew significantly faster than NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
FTDR's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTRP (93) in the null industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
FTDR's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTRP (100) in the null industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
FTDR | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MTINX | 20.81 | 0.15 | +0.73% |
NYLI Income Builder Investor Class | |||
NABIX | 12.10 | N/A | N/A |
Neuberger Berman Abs Ret Multi-Mgr I | |||
EQIDX | 12.25 | N/A | N/A |
Allspring Emerging Markets Eq Inc Adm | |||
JIGFX | 45.53 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
Janus Henderson Overseas I | |||
FWWNX | 80.57 | -0.18 | -0.22% |
American Funds New World 529-F-3 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTDR and CSV have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTDR and CSV's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FTDR | 100% | +1.99% | ||
CSV - FTDR | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
TNL - FTDR | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.29% | ||
MOND - FTDR | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
RGS - FTDR | 22% Poorly correlated | +12.39% | ||
SCI - FTDR | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTRP and PLWN have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTRP and PLWN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTRP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NTRP | 100% | +1.77% | ||
PLWN - NTRP | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SDRMF - NTRP | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ONVC - NTRP | 6% Poorly correlated | -14.29% | ||
PFSMF - NTRP | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FTDR - NTRP | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
More |