Advertisement
FTDR vs TNL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDR is a Hold and TNL is a Hold.
| FTDR | TNL | FTDR / TNL | |
| Capitalization | 5.58B | 4.09B | 136% |
| EBITDA | 525M | 706M | 74% |
| Gain YTD | 40.423 | -3.775 | -1,071% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.37 | 18.04 | 118% |
| Revenue | 2.15B | 4.09B | 52% |
| Total Cash | 627M | 282M | 222% |
| Total Debt | 1.18B | 5.71B | 21% |
FTDR | TNL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 3 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TNL's Valuation (13) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTDR (99) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than FTDR’s over the last 12 months.
FTDR's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as TNL (47) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to TNL’s over the last 12 months.
TNL's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as FTDR (14) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to FTDR’s over the last 12 months.
FTDR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as TNL (61) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to TNL’s over the last 12 months.
TNL's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as FTDR (33) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to FTDR’s over the last 12 months.
| FTDR | TNL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTDR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while TNL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FTDR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TNL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTDR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FTDR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FTDR (@Personnel Services) experienced а -1.92% price change this week, while TNL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
FTDR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
TNL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (-3.44% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
@Consumer Sundries (-1.36% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BOEG | 12.14 | 0.61 | +5.25% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | |||
| GSGO | 44.09 | 0.40 | +0.91% |
| Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | |||
| CGBL | 37.63 | 0.16 | +0.43% |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
| HYUP | 40.78 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| BNO | 61.37 | -1.76 | -2.79% |
| United States Brent Oil | |||
FTDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDR has been loosely correlated with TNL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTDR jumps, then TNL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDR | 100% | +1.82% | ||
| TNL - FTDR | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| NCLH - FTDR | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| EXPE - FTDR | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
| CCL - FTDR | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| RCL - FTDR | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||
TNL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been loosely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNL | 100% | +2.11% | ||
| CCL - TNL | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| SABR - TNL | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| NCLH - TNL | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| RCL - TNL | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| LIND - TNL | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
More | ||||