Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFFX vs RBKTX
FTFFX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFFX vs. RBKTX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFFX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. FTFFX (2.84B). FTFFX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FTFFX (1.02) vs RBKTX (0.53). FTFFX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FTFFX (22 years) vs RBKTX (19 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FTFFX (1.17). FTFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FTFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FTFFX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.34 vs. FTFFX (8.87). RBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.44 vs. FTFFX (28.00).
| FTFFX | RBKTX | FTFFX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.45 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.45 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.974 | 12.097 | 74% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.84B | 48.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.53 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | 12.34 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.30 | 28.67 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.00 | 36.44 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.97 | 72.79 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers