Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFGX vs TRIGX
FTFGX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts FTFGX vs TRIGX
Templeton Foreign R6
Price$8.69
Change-$0.05 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.28
Change-$0.07 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.5B
FTFGX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFGX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFGX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.5B vs. FTFGX (2.52B). FTFGX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: FTFGX (2.42) vs TRIGX (2.05). FTFGX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: FTFGX (12 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTFGX (0.78). FTFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.01 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTFGX: TRIGX (2500) vs FTFGX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. FTFGX (10.08). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.87 vs. FTFGX (64.35).
| FTFGX | TRIGX | FTFGX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.87 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.332 | 25.250 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 15.5B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 2.05 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.08 | 23.68 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.13 | 68.99 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.35 | 98.87 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.26 | 72.81 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers