Ad is loading...
FTFQX vs IORCX
FTFQX vs IORCX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs IORCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.32B
Invesco California Municipal R6
Price$7.67
Change+$0.05 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
FTFQX vs IORCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. IORCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and IORCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. IORCX (2.11B). IORCX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: IORCX (4.27) vs FTFQX (3.50). FTFQX was incepted earlier than IORCX: FTFQX (7 years) vs IORCX (6 years). IORCX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). IORCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FTFQX (14.01). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than IORCX: FTFQX (1000) vs IORCX (1000000). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.46 vs. IORCX (-1.19). IORCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.59 vs. FTFQX (-2.50).
| FTFQX | IORCX | FTFQX / IORCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.710 | -4.795 | 77% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 2.11B | 584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 4.27 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.46 | -1.19 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.38 | 4.49 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.50 | 6.59 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...