Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs IORCX
FTFQX vs IORCX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs IORCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.57B
Invesco California Municipal R6
Price$7.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
FTFQX vs IORCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. IORCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and IORCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. IORCX (2.1B). IORCX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: IORCX (4.43) vs FTFQX (3.60). FTFQX was incepted earlier than IORCX: FTFQX (7 years) vs IORCX (6 years). IORCX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FTFQX (0.76). IORCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than IORCX: FTFQX (1000) vs IORCX (1000000). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.66 vs. IORCX (-1.31). IORCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FTFQX (-4.04).
| FTFQX | IORCX | FTFQX / IORCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.772 | -3.086 | 57% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 2.1B | 601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 4.43 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.66 | -1.31 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.62 | 7.48 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.04 | 3.55 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers