Ad is loading...
FTFQX vs JCSRX
FTFQX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.52B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.69M
FTFQX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. JCSRX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. JCSRX (525M). JCSRX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: JCSRX (3.78) vs FTFQX (3.56). FTFQX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FTFQX (7 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than JCSRX (0.69). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FTFQX (14.01). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FTFQX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.20 vs. JCSRX (-0.42). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 8.61 vs. FTFQX (-1.22).
| FTFQX | JCSRX | FTFQX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.52 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.69 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.787 | -2.754 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 525M | 2,381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 3.78 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.20 | -0.42 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.06 | 7.93 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.22 | 8.61 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...