Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs JCSRX
FTFQX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.78M
FTFQX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. JCSRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. JCSRX (518M). JCSRX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: JCSRX (3.86) vs FTFQX (3.59). FTFQX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FTFQX (7 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than JCSRX (0.69). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FTFQX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.28 vs. JCSRX (-2.00). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 4.26 vs. FTFQX (-4.36).
| FTFQX | JCSRX | FTFQX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.52 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.69 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.358 | -3.636 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 518M | 2,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 3.86 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.28 | -2.00 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.69 | 8.89 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.36 | 4.26 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement