Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs LCFFX
FTFQX vs LCFFX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs LCFFX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.37B
Lord Abbett California Tax Free F
Price$9.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets642.93M
FTFQX vs LCFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. LCFFX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and LCFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. LCFFX (643M). FTFQX (3.56) and LCFFX (3.56) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than LCFFX: FTFQX (7 years) vs LCFFX (18 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than LCFFX (0.67). LCFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). LCFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTFQX: LCFFX (0) vs FTFQX (1000). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. LCFFX (-0.29). LCFFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.14 vs. FTFQX (-3.94).
| FTFQX | LCFFX | FTFQX / LCFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.67 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.824 | -3.107 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 643M | 1,928% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 3.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -0.29 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.50 | 6.07 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.94 | -0.14 | 2,765% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers