Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs LCFFX
FTFQX vs LCFFX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs LCFFX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
Lord Abbett California Tax Free F
Price$9.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.63M
FTFQX vs LCFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. LCFFX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and LCFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. LCFFX (644M). LCFFX (3.61) and FTFQX (3.59) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than LCFFX: FTFQX (7 years) vs LCFFX (18 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than LCFFX (0.67). LCFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). LCFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTFQX: LCFFX (0) vs FTFQX (1000). FTFQX (-1.28) and LCFFX (-1.34) have marching annual gain over last year. LCFFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.64 vs. FTFQX (-4.36).
| FTFQX | LCFFX | FTFQX / LCFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.67 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.358 | -2.711 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 644M | 1,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 3.61 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.28 | -1.34 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.69 | 8.87 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.36 | -1.64 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers