Ad is loading...
FTFQX vs MSCAX
FTFQX vs MSCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSCAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FTFQX vs MSCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSCAX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MSCAX (1.24B). MSCAX (3.57) and FTFQX (3.50) have matching dividends . FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSCAX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSCAX (12 years). FTFQX (0.76) and MSCAX (0.76) have similar cost to investors . MSCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (14.01). FTFQX initial investment is less costly to investors than MSCAX (3%) vs MSCAX (3%). FTFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCAX: FTFQX (1000) vs MSCAX (15000). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. MSCAX (0.45). MSCAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.56 vs. FTFQX (-1.46).
| FTFQX | MSCAX | FTFQX / MSCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.75 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.76 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.676 | -2.995 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 15000 | 7% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.24B | 998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 3.57 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | 0.45 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.46 | 6.56 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.46 | 3.56 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers