Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs MSODX
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSODX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.53B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Class R6
Price$9.34
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSODX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. MSODX (1.24B). MSODX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: MSODX (3.89) vs FTFQX (3.59). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSODX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSODX (6 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than MSODX (0.48). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). MSODX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTFQX: MSODX (0) vs FTFQX (1000). MSODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.84 vs. FTFQX (-1.13). MSODX return over 5 years is better than : 1.36 vs. FTFQX (-4.22).
| FTFQX | MSODX | FTFQX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.209 | -2.417 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 1.24B | 1,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 3.89 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.13 | -0.84 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.85 | 10.82 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.22 | 1.36 | -309% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers