Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs MSODX
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSODX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.57B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Class R6
Price$9.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSODX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. MSODX (1.24B). MSODX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: MSODX (3.87) vs FTFQX (3.60). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSODX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSODX (6 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than MSODX (0.48). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). MSODX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTFQX: MSODX (0) vs FTFQX (1000). MSODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.11 vs. FTFQX (-0.66). MSODX return over 5 years is better than : 1.82 vs. FTFQX (-4.04).
| FTFQX | MSODX | FTFQX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.772 | -1.793 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 1.24B | 1,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 3.87 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.66 | -0.11 | 607% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.62 | 9.14 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.04 | 1.82 | -222% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers