Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs MSODX
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSODX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Class R6
Price$9.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSODX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MSODX (1.23B). MSODX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: MSODX (3.87) vs FTFQX (3.60). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSODX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSODX (6 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than MSODX (0.48). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). MSODX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTFQX: MSODX (0) vs FTFQX (1000). MSODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.58 vs. FTFQX (-2.30). MSODX return over 5 years is better than : -0.66 vs. FTFQX (-6.57).
| FTFQX | MSODX | FTFQX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.114 | -2.841 | 110% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.23B | 1,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 3.87 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.30 | -1.58 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.71 | 6.10 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.57 | -0.66 | 997% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers