Ad is loading...
FTFQX vs MSODX
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSODX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.32B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Class R6
Price$9.30
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSODX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. MSODX (1.23B). MSODX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: MSODX (3.84) vs FTFQX (3.50). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSODX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSODX (5 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than MSODX (0.48). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (14.01). MSODX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTFQX: MSODX (0) vs FTFQX (1000). MSODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.33 vs. FTFQX (-0.46). MSODX return over 5 years is better than : 4.34 vs. FTFQX (-2.50).
| FTFQX | MSODX | FTFQX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.710 | -3.445 | 108% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 1.23B | 998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 3.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.46 | -0.33 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.38 | 6.62 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.50 | 4.34 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers