Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTFQX vs MSODX
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts FTFQX vs MSODX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.55
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Class R6
Price$9.33
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
FTFQX vs MSODX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTFQX vs. MSODX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTFQX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MSODX (1.23B). MSODX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: MSODX (3.88) vs FTFQX (3.56). FTFQX was incepted earlier than MSODX: FTFQX (7 years) vs MSODX (6 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than MSODX (0.48). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTFQX (7.96). MSODX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTFQX: MSODX (0) vs FTFQX (1000). FTFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.03 vs. MSODX (-0.13). MSODX return over 5 years is better than : 2.32 vs. FTFQX (-3.65).
| FTFQX | MSODX | FTFQX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.48 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.527 | -2.833 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.23B | 1,005% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 3.88 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.03 | -0.13 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.58 | 9.84 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.65 | 2.32 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers