Ad is loading...
FTGS vs SCHG
FTGS vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FTGS vs SCHG
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
Price$31.42
Change+$0.24 (+0.77%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets992.42M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$25.97
Change+$0.20 (+0.78%)
Volume$9.01K
Net Assets38.04B
FTGS vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGS vs. SCHG commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGS is a Buy and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 38B vs. FTGS (992M). FTGS has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: FTGS (-0.619) vs SCHG (-7.440). FTGS was incepted earlier than SCHG: FTGS (3 years) vs SCHG (15 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FTGS (0.60). FTGS has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| FTGS | SCHG | FTGS / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -0.619 | -7.440 | 8% |
| Net Assets | 992M | 38B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 102.00 | 3.00 | 3,400% |
| Yield | 0.41 | 0.44 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTGS | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 68% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTGS has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTGS jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTGS | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| AXP - FTGS | 81% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| ETN - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| KLAC - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| LRCX - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| AMAT - FTGS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.82% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| META - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
More | ||||