FTGS vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGS is a Buy and SNPS is a StrongBuy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTGS | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 63% | 15 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NWXVX | 10.52 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| Nationwide International Sm Cp Instl Svc | |||
| VIMCX | 60.72 | -0.12 | -0.20% |
| Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core I | |||
| WWSIX | 27.90 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| TETON Westwood SmallCap Equity I | |||
| NBHCX | 14.11 | -0.03 | -0.21% |
| Neuberger Berman Equity Income C | |||
| RGBHX | 39.31 | -0.10 | -0.25% |
| American Funds Global Balanced R5E | |||
FTGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTGS has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTGS jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTGS | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| KLAC - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| LRCX - FTGS | 77% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| AMAT - FTGS | 75% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| MPWR - FTGS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SNPS - FTGS | 72% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -1.25% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| INTU - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| ADSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||