Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs GSCZX
FTHFX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSCZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$42.57
Change+$0.33 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.65B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$16.09
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets794.92M
FTHFX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSCZX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GSCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.65B vs. GSCZX (795M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FTHFX (0.82) vs GSCZX (0.22). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSCZX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). GSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.66 vs. FTHFX (-8.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 126.05 vs. GSCZX (54.40).
| FTHFX | GSCZX | FTHFX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.001 | -8.947 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.65B | 795M | 1,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.22 | 367% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.11 | -7.66 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.78 | -10.45 | -218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 126.05 | 54.40 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.74 | -8.77 | -1,011% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers