Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs LMNSX
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMNSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
ClearBridge Small Cap I
Price$61.15
Change-$4.40 (-6.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708.79M
FTHFX vs LMNSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMNSX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. LMNSX (709M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: FTHFX (0.82) vs LMNSX (0.67). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMNSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMNSX (30 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMNSX (33.00). FTHFX (1000000) and LMNSX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.21 vs. FTHFX (-5.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. LMNSX (82.55).
| FTHFX | LMNSX | FTHFX / LMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.888 | -5.452 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.94B | 709M | 1,402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.67 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -2.21 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | -5.83 | -450% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.69 | 82.55 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.07 | 33.11 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...