Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LSCNX
FTHFX vs LSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.80
Change+$0.50 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.47B
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value N
Price$22.67
Change+$0.24 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.35M
FTHFX vs LSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LSCNX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. LSCNX (336M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LSCNX: FTHFX (0.76) vs LSCNX (0.33). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LSCNX (12 years). LSCNX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LSCNX (25.00). FTHFX (1000000) and LSCNX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.65 vs. LSCNX (-9.37). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 91.36 vs. LSCNX (0.11).
| FTHFX | LSCNX | FTHFX / LSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.937 | 0.448 | 433% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 336M | 3,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.33 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -9.37 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.01 | -8.00 | -512% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.36 | 0.11 | 85,255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.18 | -34.35 | -428% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers