Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LSCNX
FTHFX vs LSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.32
Change-$0.10 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.27B
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value N
Price$22.07
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.44M
FTHFX vs LSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LSCNX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. LSCNX (332M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LSCNX: FTHFX (0.79) vs LSCNX (0.34). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LSCNX (12 years). LSCNX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LSCNX (25.00). FTHFX (1000000) and LSCNX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.11 vs. LSCNX (-5.93). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.00 vs. LSCNX (2.92).
| FTHFX | LSCNX | FTHFX / LSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -0.985 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 332M | 3,102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.34 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.11 | -5.93 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.99 | -5.22 | -862% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.00 | 2.92 | 3,324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.97 | -37.31 | -383% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement