Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LSCNX
FTHFX vs LSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value N
Price$21.65
Change+$0.28 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.82M
FTHFX vs LSCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LSCNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and LSCNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. LSCNX (322M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LSCNX: FTHFX (0.79) vs LSCNX (0.34). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LSCNX (12 years). LSCNX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX (1000000) and LSCNX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. LSCNX (-8.89). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. LSCNX (-9.70).
| FTHFX | LSCNX | FTHFX / LSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -4.299 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 322M | 3,106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.34 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -8.89 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | -18.47 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | -9.70 | -825% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | -39.51 | -347% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement