Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs LZSCX
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Instl
Price$9.94
Change+$0.11 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.53M
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZSCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LZSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. LZSCX (32.5M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs LZSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZSCX (33 years). LZSCX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZSCX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.16 vs. LZSCX (-19.51). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.37 vs. LZSCX (-1.96).
| FTHFX | LZSCX | FTHFX / LZSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.779 | -16.890 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 32.5M | 28,108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -19.51 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | -28.49 | -70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.37 | -1.96 | -4,757% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.84 | -33.32 | -231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers