Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs LZSCX
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.06
Change-$0.14 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.79B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Instl
Price$10.60
Change-$0.06 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.99M
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZSCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LZSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.79B vs. LZSCX (35M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs LZSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZSCX (34 years). LZSCX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZSCX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.88 vs. LZSCX (-17.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.29 vs. LZSCX (-1.01).
| FTHFX | LZSCX | FTHFX / LZSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.196 | -11.371 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.79B | 35M | 27,980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | -17.83 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | -15.94 | -218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.29 | -1.01 | -9,761% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.97 | -28.08 | -459% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers