Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NINAX
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.65B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
Price$21.56
Change+$0.08 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NINAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NINAX (1.28B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINAX: FTHFX (0.95) vs NINAX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINAX: FTHFX (13 years) vs NINAX (15 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NINAX (10.00). NINAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NINAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. NINAX (13.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.76 vs. NINAX (34.92).
| FTHFX | NINAX | FTHFX / NINAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.227 | 2.569 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 1.28B | 829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 13.12 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.29 | -2.58 | -1,254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.76 | 34.92 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.48 | 54.91 | 214% |