Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NINAX
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.67
Change-$0.51 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
Price$20.83
Change-$0.30 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINAX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NINAX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NINAX (1.26B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINAX: FTHFX (0.95) vs NINAX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINAX: FTHFX (13 years) vs NINAX (15 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NINAX (10.00). NINAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NINAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.01 vs. NINAX (17.15). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.79 vs. NINAX (36.59).
| FTHFX | NINAX | FTHFX / NINAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.141 | 5.255 | 440% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 1.26B | 874% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.01 | 17.15 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.14 | -16.71 | -198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.79 | 36.59 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.85 | 37.23 | 311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...