Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NINAX
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.96
Change-$1.64 (-3.45%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
Price$20.98
Change-$0.76 (-3.50%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINAX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NINAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NINAX (1.29B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINAX: FTHFX (0.95) vs NINAX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINAX: FTHFX (13 years) vs NINAX (15 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NINAX (10.00). NINAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NINAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.69 vs. NINAX (12.24). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 78.82 vs. NINAX (40.62).
| FTHFX | NINAX | FTHFX / NINAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.441 | 9.853 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 1.29B | 821% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.69 | 12.24 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.34 | -1.45 | -2,229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.82 | 40.62 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | 50.61 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers