Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NINAX
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.65
Change-$1.01 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.13B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
Price$20.95
Change-$0.61 (-2.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.22B
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NINAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. NINAX (1.22B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINAX: FTHFX (0.95) vs NINAX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINAX: FTHFX (13 years) vs NINAX (15 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NINAX (10.00). NINAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NINAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). NINAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. FTHFX (2.86). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 69.97 vs. NINAX (30.86).
| FTHFX | NINAX | FTHFX / NINAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.695 | -0.333 | 509% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 1.22B | 829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | 6.35 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.39 | 0.19 | 16,406% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.97 | 30.86 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.29 | 37.73 | 253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers