Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NINLX
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINLX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.35 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.7B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value I
Price$19.56
Change+$0.66 (+3.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets995.13M
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NINLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. NINLX (995M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINLX: FTHFX (0.82) vs NINLX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINLX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NINLX (15 years). NINLX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NINLX (21.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NINLX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.34 vs. NINLX (-9.48). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.33 vs. NINLX (48.70).
| FTHFX | NINLX | FTHFX / NINLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.658 | -12.378 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 995M | 975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | -9.48 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | -0.37 | -9,191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.33 | 48.70 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.18 | 21.94 | 580% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers