Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NINLX
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINLX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.15
Change+$0.49 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.54B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value I
Price$22.06
Change+$0.27 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINLX commentary
Feb 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NINLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. NINLX (1.26B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINLX: FTHFX (0.95) vs NINLX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINLX: FTHFX (13 years) vs NINLX (15 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NINLX (10.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NINLX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. NINLX (10.89). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.42 vs. NINLX (43.54).
| FTHFX | NINLX | FTHFX / NINLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.730 | 1.020 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 1.26B | 837% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.26 | 10.89 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.22 | 1.02 | 3,356% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.42 | 43.54 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.37 | 56.88 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...