Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NINLX
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINLX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value I
Price$17.96
Change+$0.19 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets945.83M
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINLX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NINLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. NINLX (946M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINLX: FTHFX (0.82) vs NINLX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINLX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NINLX (15 years). NINLX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NINLX (21.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NINLX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.16 vs. NINLX (-9.48). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.37 vs. NINLX (53.19).
| FTHFX | NINLX | FTHFX / NINLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.779 | -17.617 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 946M | 966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -9.48 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | -16.92 | -117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.37 | 53.19 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.84 | 15.99 | 480% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers