Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NINLX
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINLX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.51
Change-$0.16 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value I
Price$21.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINLX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NINLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NINLX (1.12B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINLX: FTHFX (0.76) vs NINLX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINLX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NINLX (15 years). NINLX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NINLX (21.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NINLX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NINLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.56 vs. FTHFX (0.09). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.71 vs. NINLX (44.72).
| FTHFX | NINLX | FTHFX / NINLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 0.371 | 1,336% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.12B | 966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 0.56 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.71 | 11.60 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.71 | 44.72 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.50 | 45.30 | 332% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement