Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs NVSOX
FTHFX vs NVSOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NVSOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.25B
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap Adm
Price$11.35
Change-$0.12 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.92M
FTHFX vs NVSOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NVSOX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NVSOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.25B vs. NVSOX (86.9M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NVSOX: FTHFX (0.82) vs NVSOX (0.14). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NVSOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NVSOX (32 years). NVSOX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NVSOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NVSOX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.35 vs. NVSOX (-8.00). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.10 vs. NVSOX (84.52).
| FTHFX | NVSOX | FTHFX / NVSOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.920 | -13.080 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.25B | 86.9M | 10,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.14 | 590% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.35 | -8.00 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.96 | 0.08 | 27,023% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.10 | 84.52 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.18 | -53.68 | -149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers