Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WBCIX
FTHFX vs WBCIX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WBCIX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core I
Price$15.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.19M
FTHFX vs WBCIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WBCIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and WBCIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. WBCIX (124M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WBCIX: FTHFX (0.79) vs WBCIX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WBCIX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WBCIX (6 years). WBCIX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WBCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WBCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WBCIX (500000) vs FTHFX (1000000). WBCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.14 vs. FTHFX (-0.90). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. WBCIX (58.01).
| FTHFX | WBCIX | FTHFX / WBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -5.621 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 124M | 8,065% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.11 | 712% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | 3.14 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | 10.36 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | 58.01 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement