Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WSCJX
FTHFX vs WSCJX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WSCJX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.35 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.7B
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap R6
Price$12.28
Change+$0.20 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.54M
FTHFX vs WSCJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WSCJX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WSCJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. WSCJX (90.5M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WSCJX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WSCJX (0.51). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WSCJX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WSCJX (9 years). WSCJX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WSCJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WSCJX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WSCJX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.34 vs. WSCJX (-6.41). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.33 vs. WSCJX (73.03).
| FTHFX | WSCJX | FTHFX / WSCJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.658 | -7.716 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 90.5M | 10,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.51 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | -6.41 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.91 | 18.61 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.33 | 73.03 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers