Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WSCJX
FTHFX vs WSCJX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WSCJX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$45.42
Change+$0.26 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.27B
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap R6
Price$13.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.08M
FTHFX vs WSCJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WSCJX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WSCJX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. WSCJX (90.1M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WSCJX: FTHFX (0.79) vs WSCJX (0.48). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WSCJX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WSCJX (9 years). WSCJX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WSCJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WSCJX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WSCJX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). WSCJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.75 vs. FTHFX (2.64). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.16 vs. WSCJX (84.78).
| FTHFX | WSCJX | FTHFX / WSCJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 1.910 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 90.1M | 11,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.48 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.64 | 3.75 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.76 | 34.25 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.16 | 84.78 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement