Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WSCJX
FTHFX vs WSCJX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WSCJX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.73
Change+$0.57 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.02B
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap R6
Price$12.99
Change+$0.21 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.61M
FTHFX vs WSCJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WSCJX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and WSCJX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. WSCJX (94.6M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WSCJX: FTHFX (0.79) vs WSCJX (0.48). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WSCJX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WSCJX (9 years). WSCJX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WSCJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WSCJX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WSCJX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. WSCJX (-1.44). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 80.01 vs. WSCJX (59.89).
| FTHFX | WSCJX | FTHFX / WSCJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -2.368 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 94.6M | 10,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.48 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.90 | -1.44 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | 14.85 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.01 | 59.89 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement