Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTKFX vs PDBZX
FTKFX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FTKFX vs PDBZX
Fidelity Total Bond K6
Price$8.71
Change-$0.05 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.87B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.81
Change-$0.07 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.74B
FTKFX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTKFX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTKFX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. FTKFX (6.87B). FTKFX (4.74) and PDBZX (4.69) have matching dividends . FTKFX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FTKFX (8 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FTKFX (0.30). FTKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 306.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FTKFX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTKFX (4.82) and PDBZX (4.76) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.55 vs. FTKFX (-1.12).
| FTKFX | PDBZX | FTKFX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.49 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.50 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.615 | 2.455 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.87B | 48.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.74 | 4.69 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.82 | 4.76 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.50 | 7.35 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.12 | -0.55 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers