Ad is loading...
FTKFX vs PDBZX
FTKFX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FTKFX vs PDBZX
Fidelity Total Bond K6
Price$8.79
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.8B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.72B
FTKFX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTKFX vs. PDBZX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTKFX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. FTKFX (6.8B). FTKFX (4.69) and PDBZX (4.64) have matching dividends . FTKFX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FTKFX (8 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FTKFX (0.30). FTKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 306.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FTKFX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX (7.68) and FTKFX (7.65) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 1.46 vs. FTKFX (0.84).
| FTKFX | PDBZX | FTKFX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.49 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.50 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.822 | 1.738 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.8B | 48.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.69 | 4.64 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 7.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 4.94 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.84 | 1.46 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...