Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTKFX vs PDBZX
FTKFX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts FTKFX vs PDBZX
Fidelity Total Bond K6
Price$8.82
Change-$0.03 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.04B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.16B
FTKFX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTKFX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTKFX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 49.2B vs. FTKFX (7.04B). FTKFX (4.68) and PDBZX (4.60) have matching dividends . FTKFX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: FTKFX (8 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FTKFX (0.30). FTKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 306.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). FTKFX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX (5.91) and FTKFX (5.89) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.02 vs. FTKFX (-1.19).
| FTKFX | PDBZX | FTKFX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.49 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.50 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.716 | 3.640 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.04B | 49.2B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.68 | 4.60 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 5.91 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.86 | 10.00 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.19 | -1.02 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers