FTMDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
15.88M
QCCUF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
22.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTMDF vs QCCUF

Header iconFTMDF vs QCCUF Comparison
Open Charts FTMDF vs QCCUFBanner chart's image
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$76.51K
Capitalization15.88M
XXIX METAL
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$111.83K
Capitalization22.21M
FTMDF vs QCCUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTMDF vs. QCCUF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMDF is a Hold and QCCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FTMDF: $0.04 vs. QCCUF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: FTMDF and QCCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTMDF: 92% vs. QCCUF: 169%
Market capitalization -- FTMDF: $15.88M vs. QCCUF: $22.21M
FTMDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.88M. QCCUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $22.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQCCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QCCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTMDF is a better buy in the long-term than QCCUF.

Price Growth

FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.00% price change this week, while QCCUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.16% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCCUF($22.2M) has a higher market cap than FTMDF($15.9M). FTMDF has higher P/E ratio than QCCUF: FTMDF (256.41) vs QCCUF (42.19). FTMDF YTD gains are higher at: 19.943 vs. QCCUF (10.769). QCCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.4M vs. FTMDF (-31.73M). QCCUF has more cash in the bank: 12M vs. FTMDF (137K). QCCUF has less debt than FTMDF: QCCUF (125) vs FTMDF (8.61M). FTMDF (0) and QCCUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTMDFQCCUFFTMDF / QCCUF
Capitalization15.9M22.2M72%
EBITDA-31.73M-7.4M429%
Gain YTD19.94310.769185%
P/E Ratio256.4142.19608%
Revenue00-
Total Cash137K12M1%
Total Debt8.61M1256,890,400%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTMDF: Fundamental Ratings
FTMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UJUN34.450.01
+0.04%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun
GSY50.02N/A
N/A
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
MAV8.19N/A
N/A
Pioneer Municipal High Income Advantage Fund
PSWD35.37N/A
N/A
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Eq ETF
IHE63.49-0.29
-0.45%
iShares US Pharmaceuticals ETF

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-2.09%
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
AGXPF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.34%
QCCUF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUGY - FTMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
GARWF - FTMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QCCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QCCUF and LUCMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QCCUF and LUCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCCUF
1D Price
Change %
QCCUF100%
N/A
LUCMF - QCCUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
AGXPF - QCCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.34%
VZLA - QCCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
FTMDF - QCCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
NICMF - QCCUF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
More