Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTMSX vs NAESX
FTMSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FTMSX vs NAESX
FTMSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTMSX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMSX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FTMSX (28.9M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: NAESX (1.09) vs FTMSX (0.00). FTMSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FTMSX (8 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FTMSX (1.70) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTMSX: NAESX (0) vs FTMSX (100000). FTMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.69 vs. NAESX (12.70). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.46 vs. FTMSX (-1.60).
| FTMSX | NAESX | FTMSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.17 | 794% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.17 | 1,000% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.241 | 12.391 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.9M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.69 | 12.70 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.56 | 55.24 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.60 | 32.46 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 144.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement